Read + Write + Report
Home | Start a blog | About Orble | FAQ | Blogs | Writers | Paid | My Orble | Login

Little Children – A study of suburban unease

February 19th 2007 23:16

Set in a Wisteria-Lane-feeling community, Little Children follows several inhabitants whose lives intersect in playgrounds, swimming pools and streets of their small community in unexpected and potentially dangerous ways. Judgements, appearances and the perfect family are strong ideals for the people, in particular the women in this world.







Its title is ironic as it is aimed more at the parents than children and what it means to grow up. This idea is brilliantly portrayed through characters - while categorised as ‘adults who have yet to outgrow certain adolescent stages. After my last post, I am taking more notice of names and connotations, but I am still having trouble remembering titles… I asked for two tickets to see Children of God, a film I later realised that I wasn’t even sure existed. I think I was thinking of Children of a Lesser God. Anyhoo, I’m digressing into inane whittering. Back to the real title, I had assumed already assumed before seeing the film that it would be about adults rather than children, but rather than advocating my cleverness I think it was because of some of the reviews I’d read. The film’s main landscape is played out in spaces usually associated with kids and infants: playgrounds, living rooms, skateboard ramps and public pools. The actual children are portrayed as less juvenile than the adults, as silent witnesses to the grown ups’ miseries, stumbling through life, love and morality. The film and title seems to suggest the adults are the children that need to grow up.

This is actor/director Todd Field's second feature after the serious family melodrama In The Bedroom (2001), based on a novel by Tom Perrotta that, among other things, deals with adultery in a small town. I haven’t seen In The Bedroom yet, but am now definitely interested after gaining so much from seeing Little Children .

Winslet plays Sarah, mother-of-one, who does not fit into the picture perfect world of her town. She is forgetful, happy to be spontaneous and somewhat of an outcast, yet as a viewer, I was drawn towards her and her situation. When she meets househusband Brad Adamson (Patrick Wilson), with their offspring in tow at the local playground with an audience of ‘perfect’ women watching – they form an immediate bond. Both have absent partners, Sarah’s husband is addicted to on-line porn and Brad’s wife, Kathy is physically and career-wise the perfect wife. She is the main breadwinner and Brad needs to answer to her for the smallest of requests. Sarah portrays some elements of desperate selfishness; she is angry and impatient towards her daughter for needing attention when all Sarah wants is some time to herself to write.

The central theme is the relationship between Sarah and Brad. It isn’t simply an impetuous traitorous romp either… it is intimate, loving and strongly portrays elements that their marriages seems to be lacking. It is beautiful.

Field chose excellent actors – all performances are strong and convincing and the attraction between Sarah and Brad is contagious. Despite the possible effects of their affair on their spouses and children, I wanted them to be together. I felt empathy towards them and their situations.

The main sub-plot deals with a singularly unpleasant sex offender, powerfully played by Jackie Earle Haley, who is given no chance of redemption by the town’s righteous upholders of law and order. He cannot connect with people his own age and seeks sexual gratification with children or with people who - like him - cannot fit into the adult world.

Despite this being an effective, involving film, I did not find it without a couple of quibbles. My main being its oddly-delivered and prosaic voice-over narration, obviously aimed at deliberately reminding us that it was once a novel. This decision might have worked if it were in scenes where clarification or further information might have been helpful, but this was not the case. I resented being told what I knew was already happening, it was an aural and visual tautology. As a viewer I wanted to be free to learn the information myself, I didn’t want my hand held. Luckily, the effect was only intermittent and the rest of the film was enticing.

My last quibble is that I personally didn’t find the ending entirely satisfying which was so disappointing. It didn’t quite climax as effectively as I would expect the director wanted it to, but it does illustrate how their actions force them all to face truths about themselves, and - finally - accept their responsibilities as parents and spouses. This accepting is what creates maturity.

This is a moving, sad, thoughful and sometimes funny tale. It forces you to re-evaluate your idea of self and your thoughts on others and how we sometimes judge and dismiss others. It sways you to see people you would normally loath and dismiss in a differently light, which to me is a characteristic of an affecting film.




156
Vote
Add To: del.icio.us Digg Furl Spurl.net StumbleUpon Yahoo


   
subscribe to this blog 


   

   


Recent Posts:
      Combining two life loves: the cinema and a baby 
      The next step 
      And so now a film festival can be interactive... 
      Sydney's Open Air Cinemas 
      Christmas films, why oh why? 
      Under construction 
      Fish Tank 
      Sex and the City 2 
      Micmacs 
      Dedicated method actors 
Comments
24 Comments. [ Add A Comment ]

Comment by katyzzz

February 19th 2007 23:23
Tracy,

Lovely and well written, just a modern day version of Prince Charming [gone wrong perhaps]

They say there's nothing new in the world.

I wonder about that.

katyzzz

Comment by DuskDevi

February 19th 2007 23:54
Hi T....

Excellent review...2nd paragraph has me in stitches!

It forces you to re-evaluate your idea of self and your thoughts on others and how we sometimes judge and dismiss others.
...I like that.

I do want to see this, probably because of Winslett's Oscar nomination.
What do you think T...Is her performance worthy?
It's about time she won an Oscar, or has she already?

Not that it matters...it's enough to be nominated right??

Hope you're well Tracy...

Dusk

Comment by Jimbo

February 19th 2007 23:55
Yeah I was a little uneasy about this film. At some points, the film seemed a little unsure of which direction it was heading in ie. satire (ala American Beauty) or tragedy (ala Madam Bovary). They didn't even begin telling one of the storylines until about halfway through, which seemed a little wierd, considering that was the focal point at the beginning. The voiceover could have worked in the same way that it worked in American Beauty, but it sounded more like film noir narration than satire/tragedy, which let down the film a little. Still, I appreciated the contrast of adulthood to childhood and how we just can't grow out of it as simply as we'd like to.

Hah, DuskDevi, whenever I see Kate Winslett these days, I think to her cameo in the Extras, and her comment about actors always winning Oscars for playing retarded characters. Perhaps it was deliberate, but at some points I don't think she brought herself out as intelligent as she should've been given her character's background, education, and the narrator's description of her personality at the beginning of the film.

Comment by David

February 20th 2007 00:47
Tracy ...

Love the poster ...

As to narration in films? ... One of my big turn-offs ...

I once wrote an entire screenplay without even putting any characters' dialogue in ... just to train myself to write visually ... The end result? ... I found I didn't need much dialogue at all ... The dialogue ended up being very sparse and minimal ...

(Don't get me wrong though. I am not against what critics call dialogue driven films ... [read: Pulp Fiction, or anything by Tarantino] ... but essentially? Tarantino's films are not dialogue-driven ... at all ... (critics have to criticise everything because they don't understand what the term 'constructive criticism means. They think their job description on entails being 'hyper-critical') *** [Like a lot of people in both the real and virtual worlds, I guess) ... Tarantino's films are story-telling at its finest ... he's just a master of both ...

And I also don't subscribe to the theory that film is a strictly visual medium either (it has accompanying sound, which is just as important) ... Orson Welles came from a radio background, and he knew the value of sound (not necessarily someone's voice ... but just the value of sounds .... [due to his background in radio ... (and hence his mastery of it in cinema ... [Hitchcock was another one who understood this ...

I get so off track when I start ranting and raving about film ... * Back to the point ... ?

Listening to excessive narration in a film? ...

It's like a woman who won't shut up when all you want to do is kiss her ... *** ... Sometimes? You just have to kiss her to shut her up ... whether she likes it or not, or whether she was expecting it or not ... [the old element of surprise works every now and then (pity it has to work both ways and you get slapped*) ... But this woman that does accept it? You just have to keep kissing her until she gets the message ... (loud and clear?) ... Is there such a thing as Tongue Braille? ... *

And sometimes, you just have to walk out of a film and go and look for a woman who won't shut up ... ***

David ...

Comment by Ash

February 20th 2007 01:01
Hi Tracy,

I`m going to see this film tonight so I won`t read your post until I return...it sounds like an interesting one though....

I'll be baaaack

ash

Comment by KylieW

February 20th 2007 01:43
Tracy,

Great review. I'm really interested in seeing this movie. I really like Kate Winslet and want to see how she pulls this off.

I'll be sure to see this one

Kylie

Comment by JohnDoe

February 20th 2007 01:56
This the first Kate Winslett film that has ever interested me. I loved In The Bedroom, the director controlled the film well.

The subject matter of Little Children sounds enticing and a few other friends have already recommended it.

Chances are I wont see it till Dvd but thanks Tracy for thoughtful review.

Comment by Cibbuano

February 20th 2007 04:30
I'm really uninterested in this film, and your review doesn't sound too encouraging...

Comment by Luke

February 20th 2007 07:46
I didn't really like this movie. I found the narration to one of the few factors of genuine interest... one of the few aspects of the film that didn't seem like cliched Oscar-bait.

Having said that, I love Kate Winslet and am yet to pass up on another opportunity to see her naked. So the film should get points for that at least, I guess.

this was my full review - Little Children

Comment by Tracy

February 20th 2007 11:01
Hi everyone

Thanks for all your comments, sorry to be so slow in replying.

Katyzzz, I think the same story can be told in a different way....and I like that....this film had a focus on infidelity but it did not come across as being moralistic, rather I felt empathy for many of the characters...and even the sex offender in one scene (the swimming pool scene if anyone sees it). That empathy was soon shaken away though...!


Comment by Tracy

February 20th 2007 11:07
Hi Dusk

Good to see you. I'm well thanks, how are you?

I'm not sure if Kate Winslett's performance was/is Oscar worthy. It's good but I wouldn't say it's outstanding.....

Yes, I also like seeing a film that makes me look at some parts of human behaviour that makes me uncomfortable...such as feeling empathy at one stage for the sex offender as I said to katyzzz.

Glad you had a chuckle about my memory lapses....I really don't know what's happening...Freud would probably say that I subconsciously don't want to see these films, but I think he's wrong....

Byeee

Comment by Tracy

February 20th 2007 11:16
Hi Jimbo

Thanks for your comments, I also thought it was a bit shaky and uneven. I definitely thought that about the ending. It was perplexing....Which storyline was it that was introduced half-way...I can't recall that one, I'm pondering....

Yes, voice-overs can work well sometimes and horrifically other times. I also thought that the Madame Bovary references were a bit obvious....but it did illustrate the book club members' judgements strongly.

I like what you said about the transition from childhood to adulthood not going quite as well as we would like...that's very true to life. And yes, I think Kate's education, aspirations could have been drawn out more as well as her absent relationship with her husband.

Byeeee

Comment by Tracy

February 20th 2007 11:20
Hello David

Yes, I like the poster and the sensuality of this film. The first sexual scene was particulalry striking as it was tender and intimtae, accentuated by their cokmplete nudity.

Voice-overs are a film device that does tend to drive me a bit batty so that's why I think I mentioned it strongly in my review. It was only used at certain times, but it was those certain times where it felt crucial not to be told what was happening, I wanted to feel it, to sense it....I didn't want it to be forced.....




Comment by Tracy

February 20th 2007 11:21
Hello Ash

I'm looking forward to hearing what you think about it

Byeee

Comment by Tracy

February 20th 2007 11:23
Hello Kylie

Thanks for your comments. I enjoy and devour character-driven films which is why despite its flaws, I was immersed in the film.

I'm looking forward to hearing what you think when you've seen it

Comment by Tracy

February 20th 2007 11:28
Hi John

Thanks for your comments. That's interesting that you've heard positive things about it, only one of my friends has seen it so far and he thought a lot of it.

I'm really interested in seeing In The Bedroom, especially after hearing your opinion. I hadn't heard of it before this film.

I think it can easily be a DVD choice, rather than a cinema one.

Tracy

Comment by Tracy

February 20th 2007 11:30
Hello Cib

In some ways it's a subtle film where the messages creep up on you....and I like that....

As I said to Kylie, I tend to devour character-driven films which is why despite its flaws, I was immersed in the film. To simply say it's good or bad is too simplistic for me...I like to dissect and think it through afterwards...if it's worth it of course...

But it doesn't sound like it would be your cup of tea...



Comment by Tracy

February 20th 2007 11:31
Hey Luke

I'll read your review and comment in a bit....

Comment by Luke

February 20th 2007 12:06
You know, I felt empathy for the sex offender in every scene bar the one where he makes that poor woman cry. I mean, even when they talk about his past offence... he only exposed himself didn't he? I mean, sure, that's pretty wrong, but the dude had issues (as evidenced by the playground scene near the end) - he hardly deserved to be hated by everyone forever.

Comment by Bryn

February 21st 2007 22:17
Nice review.
I found the ending kinda interesting. It isn't wholly satisfying, the director purposefully builds up this tension suggesting something even worse is going to happen .... but it doesn't, just like life's own strange permutations of joy and sorrow, they never pull or push the way you want them to ...
How's the urgent sex on the washing machine! Now that's gotta get your clothes clean!
Patrick Wilson is a hot new talent!
The voiceover was intriguing ... no one is credited to it at film's end.
I hope Kate gets the Oscar (in recognition of Eternal Sunshine as well)

Comment by Ash

February 24th 2007 05:23
Can you believe this movie is already off circuit? I was so frustrated when I got there and it was gone...will have to wait patiently for the DVD now!!!

I caught 'Music and Lyrics' instead...ah what a great film! I laughed the whole way through (no one else seemed to so maybe it is just my warped sense of humour )

will have to come back even later now!!!

ash

Comment by Tracy

February 24th 2007 05:46
Hi Ash

I was wondering if you saw it, I can't believe it's not on anymore!! I was really curious to hear what you thought of it. That's ridiculous. Well, when you see it on DVD, I'd still love to hear what you thought

I'm seeing Music and Lyrics at the Mums and Bubs session with my friend on Thurs. By the way, I think they should rename those sessions to Mums, Bubs and Friends, but I guess that's an aside.

All the reviews that I've read have said that film is rubbish, but I don't care. As I always say, sometimes you have to have a bit of fluff in life. It's great to hear that you said it made you laugh....now I'm looking forward to it even more...

Trace xx

Comment by Ash

February 24th 2007 05:53
Tell me about it! It was on for such a short time and they have movies on from MONTHS ago that are still running...argh!!

*lol* mums, bubs and friends...love it!

I hope you enjoy the film, like I say I have a pretty weird sense of humour, but I chuckled the whole way through...hope you do too

have fun Orble gal pal
*hugs*
ash

Comment by Tracy

February 24th 2007 06:00
I love chuckley films

I know what you mean, some films stay on for eons and then others just disappear....

Strange.....maybe someone should do a study on it...probably someone has....

Have a lovely night xxx


Add A Comment

To create a fully formatted comment please click here.


CLICK HERE TO LOGIN | CLICK HERE TO REGISTER

Name or Orble Tag
Home Page (optional)
Comments
Bold Italic Underline Strikethrough Separator Left Center Right Separator Quote Insert Link Insert Email
Notify me of replies
Your Email Address
(optional)
(required for reply notification)
Submit
More Posts
1 Posts
1 Posts
1 Posts
210 Posts dating from August 2006
Email Subscription
Receive e-mail notifications of new posts on this blog:
0

Tracy's Blogs

305 Vote(s)
9 Comment(s)
3 Post(s)
0 Vote(s)
0 Comment(s)
0 Post(s)
Moderated by Tracy
Copyright © 2012 On Topic Media PTY LTD. All Rights Reserved. Design by Vimu.com.
On Topic Media ZPages: Sydney |  Melbourne |  Brisbane |  London |  Birmingham |  Leeds     [ Advertise ] [ Contact Us ] [ Privacy Policy ]