Which book do you think should never have been made into a film?
October 26th 2006 07:00
Tell me which film really grates on your nerves so much that you wish it had never been made into a film…and why?
Here’s a few ideas of books that have been made into films:
Bridget Jones’ Diary - Helen Fielding
About a Boy - Nick Hornsby
The Da Vinci Code - Dan Brown
The Devil Wears Prada – Lauren Weisberger
Dracula – Bram Stoker
The English Patient - Michael Ondaatje
Frankenstein – Mary Shelley
Any Harry Potter films…
Lady in the Water: A Bedtime Story - M. Night Shyamalan
Last Temptation of Christ - Nikos Kazantzakis
Any of The Lord of the Rings Trilogy
Memoirs of a Geisha - Arthur Golden
Naked Lunch - William S. Burroughs
Looking forward to hearing your thoughts.....
Here’s a few ideas of books that have been made into films:
Bridget Jones’ Diary - Helen Fielding
About a Boy - Nick Hornsby
The Da Vinci Code - Dan Brown
The Devil Wears Prada – Lauren Weisberger
Dracula – Bram Stoker
The English Patient - Michael Ondaatje
Frankenstein – Mary Shelley
Any Harry Potter films…
Lady in the Water: A Bedtime Story - M. Night Shyamalan
Last Temptation of Christ - Nikos Kazantzakis
Any of The Lord of the Rings Trilogy
Memoirs of a Geisha - Arthur Golden
Naked Lunch - William S. Burroughs
Looking forward to hearing your thoughts.....
| 154 |
| Vote |
Subscribe to this blog





















Comment by Cibbuano
20/20 Filmsight
Science News
Hunt Famous
Orble Post of the Day
Fat Cult
Techbreak
I think Battlefield Earth was the worst adaptation... in the hands of a talented production crew, it could be epic.
Comment by Tracy
Movies and Life
That's a pity about Battlefield Earth not being that great. I haven't seen that either.
Amazing what a difference it makes with the adaptation being in the right hands. It can really work or go pair-shaped.
Comment by Lizard68591
The Blog Formerly Known As Saturday Morning Movie Club
Comment by Tracy
Movies and Life
I haven't read that book either and I thought that the trailer for it looked dodgy. I haven't talked to anyone that's seen it so your opinion is really interesting, thanks.
I guess it wasn't scary?
Tracy
Comment by Ragin Cajun
Observer's Post
Death By Myopia
Comment by Tracy
Movies and Life
I haven't read the book yet, even though it's on my 'to read' shelf. I know it's supposed to be very good. What a pity the same can't be applied to the film.
Tracy
Comment by Tracy
Movies and Life
Comment by Yolanda
Comment by Tracy
Movies and Life
The book came first in 1998 and then the film in 2002. I really liked both the film and the book, but I know many people read the book and enjoyed it and thought the film wasn't up to scratch. Different tastes.....
Byee
Comment by Yolanda
Comment by Tracy
Movies and Life
Comment by MelissaA
Fun Facts
You couldn't get much more off the plot in those two, especially the 2nd one. The actual character of Jason Bourne was the only thing the same in the movie from the entire book.
Total waste of time and effort - if they're going to make up a completely different storyline, then they should rename the character and call it something else!
Comment by Tracy
Movies and Life
Thanks for your comments. I haven't seen any of the Bourne films so I can't add anything useful. I can't believe they were cheeky enough to use the titles and name from the book and basically nothing else, what a rip-off! Did you like the films even though they were so different from the books?
Tracy
Comment by MelissaA
Fun Facts
Let's just say that the books had so much unused potential - I am clueless as to why they went the way that they did. If it wasn't for Matt Damon I don't think I would have watched them at all. ; )
Comment by Tracy
Movies and Life
Comment by Tracy
Movies and Life
Comment by Stanley
one flew over the cuckoos nest also but that's because i loved the book so much rather than the movie being bad. i had a different vision of how the movie would play out.
Comment by Tracy
Movies and Life
Yes, I agree with you about Your text goes hereBonfire of the Vanities, that didn't do much for me either.
I had forgotten that One Flew Over the Cuckoo's Nest was originally a book. I really liked the film and thought it was well-done, but it sounds like it took a different direction to the book?
Tracy
Comment by KarenC
Genghis Gal
I loved both the book and movie of About A Boy, I have to say.
And I absolutely hated the book of The DaVinci Code and will never ever see the movie. That's one book that should never have been written.
Devil Wears Prada - ordinary book and I have no desire to see the film.
As much as I love the trilogy of the Lord of the Rings and was dreading them being made into films - I absolutely loved the films. Almost all of the characters were just as I had imagined, the story followed reasonably well the original books ... thought they were sensational, in all honesty.
There have been some atrocious adaptations of Pride and Prejudice, but the Colin Firth, Jennifer Ehle version was sensational. Hated Greer Garson and Laurence Olivier though.
Comment by The Voices in my Head
The Voices in my Head
The book read so beautifully and effortlessly. The movie was a shredding of my internal movie and I have not been able to read the book since.
Comment by kryzb
The book I wish that wasn't made into a film is Lolita - one of the greatest books ever written in my opinion. Forget the Jeremy Irons version, it's crap and definitely shouldn't have been made. I'm taking about the 1962 version. Even though Nabokov adapted the screenplay from his own book (admittedly little of which was used) and Kubrick directed the film, it suffered greatly at the hands of the censors. In a 1972 Newsweek interview, Kubrick said that had he realized how severe the censorship limitations were going to be, he "probably wouldn't have made the film." Ultimately, both Nabokov and Kubrick disowned the film (for different reasons) and we should too.
Having said that, one of the best adaptations would have to be American Psycho. A terrible book but a great film!
kryz.
Comment by Tracy
Movies and Life
I've only seen excerpts of both versions of Lolita and they did not look good at all, the 1962 version seemed over-done and cheesy.
I liked both the book and the film of American Psycho, thought they were both great!
Tracy
Comment by Stanley
Comment by Tracy
Movies and Life
Comment by Bryn
Horrorphile
I am terrified of what Tom Tywker will have done to Peter Suskind's Perfume. Sure, he's german director directing a German written novel ... but still, the novel has so much stuff that is nigh on unfilmable, without it being truly transgressive cinema ... we're talking about a full-on peasant/artisocracy orgy as well as someone being literally devoured alive ....
Although Roger Avery's adatpation of Brett Easton Ellis' brilliant novel of dysfunctional and decadent uni student life The Rules of Attraction was entertaining, it certainly didn't capture the lusty nihilism of the novel ... and now Avery is making Ellis's Glamorama, one of the finest novels of the past ten years.
Comment by kryzb
We sure aren't going to agree on Ellis! - to my mind he is a pulp fiction hack. =)
Another poor film adaption that comes to mind would have to be Troy (which I only watched the other night) based on Homer's Iliad. The adaptation, if you can call it that, is so loose I wonder if is it fair to call Troy an adaption of the Iliad at all?
kryz
Comment by Tracy
Movies and Life
Thanks for all your comments. I agree with you about Bridget Jones' Diary. I also really liked the book and thought the film was pretty pathetic, they could've made it so much edgier.
I also really liked both the book and movie of About A Boy. Yes, why was The Da Vinci Code written? I was beginning to think that I was the only one that didn't like the book. I tried the first few pages and it just seemed too dull. As I mentioned earlier, I thought the film was lacklustre.
Again, I agree with you about The Devil Wears Prada book. When I started reading it, I thought it was going to be a good laugh, but it tried too hard. The film was amusing in parts but very Hollywoodised.
I'd better go now, that's enough moaning for one post.
Byee
Comment by Tracy
Movies and Life
I hadn't realised that Avery was making a film of Glamorama, I'll look forward to that adaptation.
Tracy
Comment by Tracy
Movies and Life
This is going to be an inane response to your comment about Troy and its linkage to Homer's Illiad. I haven't seen the film nor read Illiad, but I just wanted to let you know that I read your comment
Comment by Bryn
Horrorphile
I'm curious, did you make up your mind on Ellis after just one book? Or have you read several ...?
His latest, Lunar Park, is a thoroughly compelling decontruction of himself as both writer and celebrity, written almost as an ode to the stylistics of Stephen King.
Perhaps that will put the final nail in the coffin of Ellis as far as your concerned, but on the contrary, I feel it broadens Ellis's literary horizons as it takcles something entirely new, which I've not heard of any other comtemprary writer doing (writing a novel which is blur between autobiography and horror novel).
Comment by kryzb
Admittedly I made my mind up about Ellis after reading American Psycho. And that was a while ago. I may just l have to blow the dust off and give it another shot. I'm always open to updating my views. If Ellis can expand his literary horizons as a writer I can too as a reader.
When you talk of the writer blurring the line between autobiography and novel I think of William S. Burroughs. Much of his work is semi-autobiographical, in particular, Junkie, which explores his opiate addiction, and Queer, which explores his homosexuality.
Btw, I've got lots of time for Stephen King, I grew up reading his books! But you've reminded me of The Running Man. That's one of my favourite short stories! I have to say, to return to the post topic, that while Arnie delivers some great one liners in the film, I don't think it's half as good as King's story.
=) kryz.
Comment by Kiwi Author
Conversations from NZ
Kiwi author's short stories
Conversations from NZ
Swept from the Sea (fiction/romance)
As to books I would like to see made into a film (depending on the director, would have to be Ridley Scott or Peter Jackson) The Devils of D Day, any of the Harlequin series, Pandoras Star/ Judas Unchained and last but not least The Chronicles of Lamora
Hal
Comment by Tracy
Movies and Life
Thanks for your comments, I haven't heard of the books you've mentioned, I'll look them up....yes, like you said, a lot does depend on how the director does them,
Tracy
Comment by Aimzster
Health and Beauty
Reality TV
The Jeepney Stop
First Time Mum
Comment by Tracy
Movies and Life
Yes, I definitely agree with you about The Da Vinci Code. I think I'm one of the few people in the world that didn't read the book, I just couldn't get into it. Not that I really tried, I only read a couple of pages and books generally need a bit more than that. I might try it again in a few more years when the hype has died down. I'm a bit of an anti-hype viewer and reader.
Yes, the film was appalling. I think you should've stood up and booed (if you're that brave, I'm not, so who am I to talk?). I thought the film was lacklustre and really shouldn't have been made. I made it through the first half an hour and it was appalling. The acting was weak, the accents dodgy and it was so gloomy and not at all suspenseful. It showed no signs of getting better, so as it was a DVD I felt no remorse about getting upon and doing something more useful with my time.
Yes, I think the Potter and LOTR films are well-done, those effects are incredible.
Comment by Mike Crowl
Webitz
Work Report
Comment by Tracy
Movies and Life
I have looked at that film so many times in the video shop and felt as though I should see it but something always stops me.....if I ever do see it, I will remember what you said and that scene you mentioned.
Thanks,
Tracy
Comment by Mike Crowl
Webitz
Work Report
Mike
Comment by Tracy
Movies and Life