Read + Write + Report
Home | Start a blog | About Orble | FAQ | Blogs | Writers | Paid | My Orble | Login

My decadent day

September 6th 2006 05:55
Last Friday was my first day off in a while, I decided that after doing all the usual running around I would be self-indulgent and see a film. I checked the website of my local cinemas, Dendy, Palace, The Chauvel etc and lastly Hoyts. Hoyts is generally a place that I see a more mainstream film consciously knowing that the atmosphere is less intimate, the prices are higher and my money goes to huge corporation instead of one the smaller cinemas that need the support (I’m still mourning for the Valhalla). But I knew I wasn’t in the food for a film that was too heavy or too close to reality, even though there were lots of good films on at The Dendy that I hadn’t yet seen. I was in the mood for a film that would make me think only slightly but with an air of fluff.

I read the Friends with Money synopsis and it sounded like a viable candidate, it seemed to fit my criteria. As usual, I then read the review by Margaret and David from the At The Movies website and they both gave it favourable reviews and four stars each. It might sound like I place David and Margaret on a film pedestal and that thought might have an element of truth, but in this case I was more investigative, with an air of monetary tightness. Seeing a film at Hoyts is more expensive than the Dendy and other independent cinemas, so I wanted to know that I wasn’t going to waste my money on a complete load of crap. Anyhoo, D & M’s review told me that the film was made by the same director, Nicole Holofcener who did Lovely and Amazing, a film I really liked. So, that was that, my decision was made.

My expectations weren’t too high for the film; I just needed a bit of escapism, peace and entertainment for two hours. As you might have guessed, it had been a bit of a stressful and hectic week.

The film surprised me; I was involved almost immediately. Holofcener cleverly delves into the lives of her characters in an absorbing, compelling and non-conventional way. The language was witty, the characters realistic as well as funny. The characters’ individual idiosyncrasies were strong, often with a ring of truth to them. At times, it was uncomfortable watching these varying relationships, recognising either myself or some actions or reactions from my own life. The frenzied Frances McDormand intrigued me in a paradoxical way. Her character is so strong, so strange with creating a few moments of embarrassed cringing but at the same time admiration for a woman strong enough to go against some of society’s seemingly unnecessary restraints. For example, she decided that she was no longer going to wash her hair because it would only get dirty and need washing again, so she didn’t see the point in wasting her time. She didn’t change her mind at all, despite the blatant remarks from her husband and friends and remained true to her belief.

To me, the pivotal appeal of this film to me was that it realistically captured a familiar section of human behaviour without clichés and being contrived. All in all, I was happy with my Hoyts off- the-cuff decision.


87
Vote
Add To: del.icio.us Digg Furl Spurl.net StumbleUpon Yahoo


   
subscribe to this blog 


   

   


Recent Posts:
      Combining two life loves: the cinema and a baby 
      The next step 
      And so now a film festival can be interactive... 
      Sydney's Open Air Cinemas 
      Christmas films, why oh why? 
      Under construction 
      Fish Tank 
      Sex and the City 2 
      Micmacs 
      Dedicated method actors 
Comments
4 Comments. [ Add A Comment ]

Comment by JohnDoe

September 6th 2006 06:33
Im a massive Catherine Keener fan (Could be my favourite working actress after Jennifer Jason Leigh) and really enjoyed Lovely and Amazing. Frances McDormand is also good.

I will wait for DVD on this one though, because I can't imagine lasting through an entire movie that Jennifer Aniston appears in. They would have had my buck long ago if it wasnt for that.

Comment by Tracy

September 6th 2006 06:44
Yes, I think they are both brilliant actors as well. I know what you mean about Jennifer Aniston, but she is very good in this film. Her role is quirky, off-beat and she does a good job. Did you see her in The Good Girl? I thought she did a good diversion away from her usual fluffy films.

Comment by JohnDoe

September 6th 2006 07:00
I thought she dragged the Good Girl down, it was an average film that could have been far better with out her.

Comment by Tracy

September 6th 2006 07:11
Ahh, I liked that film, but yes it wasn't brilliant. I liked its concept but it was quite slow really.

Add A Comment

To create a fully formatted comment please click here.


CLICK HERE TO LOGIN | CLICK HERE TO REGISTER

Name or Orble Tag
Home Page (optional)
Comments
Bold Italic Underline Strikethrough Separator Left Center Right Separator Quote Insert Link Insert Email
Notify me of replies
Your Email Address
(optional)
(required for reply notification)
Submit
More Posts
1 Posts
1 Posts
1 Posts
210 Posts dating from August 2006
Email Subscription
Receive e-mail notifications of new posts on this blog:
0

Tracy's Blogs

305 Vote(s)
9 Comment(s)
3 Post(s)
0 Vote(s)
0 Comment(s)
0 Post(s)
Moderated by Tracy
Copyright © 2012 On Topic Media PTY LTD. All Rights Reserved. Design by Vimu.com.
On Topic Media ZPages: Sydney |  Melbourne |  Brisbane |  London |  Birmingham |  Leeds     [ Advertise ] [ Contact Us ] [ Privacy Policy ]